The Job Was Sold. What Did Production Actually Receive?
Sales-to-production handoff integrity
The job was sold. What did production actually receive? A painting job can be estimated correctly and still start wrong. Before production owns the job, can the record show: - exact surfaces in scope and what is excluded; - prep assumptions and repairs; - color names, codes, sheens and product; - access, protection and site constraints; - photos of existing conditions; - promises or exceptions made during the sale? If the crew has to ask the customer what was sold, the handoff already failed. Take one job sold this week. Compare the proposal with what production and the crew actually received. Anything that exists only in someone's memory is still a production risk.
Painting-specific handoff details—scope, prep, colors, sheen, product, access, site conditions and sales promises—turn a broad operations idea into a concrete production-risk test an owner or PM can run on a real sold job.
New painting-specific editorial master. Hash covers the exact internal text master; provider/channel and UTM assignment remain deferred to G5.
No channel/provider route is assigned. Any derivative remains a separate post-G4/G5 decision.
Replacement D1 master requires fresh G1–G3/Craft evidence and founder G4 certification for this new hash; the former continuity hash is superseded.
ead842369c822a5c1be688846b3769a24b20c8fa937d3e122bc108c8364cfa26Provider/source UTM assignment deferred to G5.














